Manual control reviews are a slow, grinding part of compliance work that most auditors quietly dread. You pull the documentation, cross-reference three or four frameworks by hand, write up the findings, and format everything for the evidence package. That process can eat half a workday for a single control. It is repetitive, error-prone, and honestly not the best use of a skilled auditor’s time.
Compliance AI is a tool built to fix exactly that. You paste in any IT general control description, and it returns a full structured audit report in under 20 seconds. Risk score, audit opinion, control gaps, remediation recommendations, and framework alignment across SOX ITGC, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and HITRUST. No setup, no configuration, no credit card needed to try it.
The tool was built by Gus Olivares, founder of Cyber Global Technologies, after more than 20 years working in IT compliance and internal audit. That background shows. The outputs are structured the way auditors actually need them, not the way a software developer imagines they might.
Key Features of Compliance AI
Automated Risk Scoring Engine
Every analysis comes back with a numeric risk score from 0 to 100, plus a clear risk tier: Low, Moderate, High, or Critical. This is not a generic severity label. The score reflects the actual control description you submitted, mapped against real framework requirements. A shared admin account with no individual authentication, for example, scores 14 out of 100 and lands at Critical Risk. The engine surfaces exactly why.
Six-Framework Alignment in One Pass
Most teams manually cross-reference controls against multiple frameworks one at a time. Compliance AI checks all six simultaneously: SOX ITGC, ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST 800-53, CIS Controls v8, PCI-DSS v4.0, and HITRUST. Each report tags the specific framework clauses and control references that apply. No separate lookup required.
Structured Audit-Ready Reports
The output is not a summary blurb. Each report includes an executive summary, a formal audit opinion, key risks, identified control gaps, and specific remediation recommendations. The format is designed for walkthrough meetings and evidence packages. On the Startup and Enterprise plans, you can export directly to PDF or CSV, ready to hand over to auditors or clients.
Developer API for Automated Workflows
The Enterprise tier includes full API access. You can POST any control text to the /api/analyze endpoint and get back structured JSON with the score, key risks, control gaps, and recommendations. There are also export endpoints for PDF and CSV. For security and compliance platforms that need to run bulk analyses or integrate audit checks into CI pipelines, this is a serious capability.
A Real Scenario: Marcus at 8:47 AM on a Tuesday
Marcus is an internal auditor at a mid-size financial services firm. His team has a SOC 2 walkthrough scheduled for Thursday. At 8:47 AM on Tuesday, his manager drops three new IT general controls into the shared drive and asks for gap analysis documentation by end of day Wednesday.
Under the old workflow, Marcus would spend the rest of Tuesday morning pulling framework references, cross-checking each control against SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria and ISO 27001 requirements, writing up findings in a Word doc, and formatting everything to match their evidence template. Easily three to four hours of focused work, just for those three controls.
Instead, Marcus opens Compliance AI, pastes the first control description, a quarterly user access review process with no documented evidence retention, and hits analyze. Eighteen seconds later he has a structured report: risk score 72 out of 100, Moderate Risk, with a specific audit opinion noting partial effectiveness, a flagged control gap around missing operating evidence, and a recommendation to validate that the control was performed consistently. The framework alignment tags SOC 2 CC6.1 through CC6.8, ISO 27001 A.8.2, and NIST 800-53 AC-2.
He runs all three controls in under four minutes total. By 9:15 AM, he is drafting the actual remediation conversation with the control owner, not still buried in framework lookups. The documentation goes to his manager by noon.
How Compliance AI Processes a Control
Step 1: Paste Your Control Description
No special formatting needed. You paste the control text as-is, whether it is one sentence or a full paragraph pulled from your GRC documentation.
Step 2: AI Analysis Runs Against All Six Frameworks
The engine evaluates your control against SOX ITGC, ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST 800-53, CIS Controls v8, PCI-DSS v4.0, and HITRUST at the same time. The whole process takes under 20 seconds.
Step 3: Receive the Structured Audit Report
You get a full report with risk score, audit opinion, key risks, control gaps, remediation recommendations, and specific framework clause references. Enterprise users can export the report as a formatted PDF or structured CSV immediately.
Pricing
Compliance AI offers four tiers:
- Free Demo: $0, free to try, no credit card required, risk scoring and basic recommendations
- Starter: $29 per month, 30 analyses, full reports with downloadable exports
- Startup: $99 per month, 150 analyses, priority support, suited for internal audit teams
- Enterprise: $499 per month, unlimited analyses, full API access, multi-user support, dedicated onboarding
No credit card is required to start. The free tier gives you five real analyses to test with actual controls before committing to anything.
Who Should Try Compliance AI
If you work in compliance, internal audit, or IT security and spend meaningful chunks of your week manually reviewing controls against SOX, SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, or HITRUST, this tool is worth testing today. It will not replace the judgment calls that come with experience, but it will handle the time-consuming documentation and framework cross-referencing that eats up hours you could spend on higher-value work. Start free at compliance.cyberglobal.ai.
